Entries in arthas (13)

Thursday
Feb042010

Fall of Salvation: Should Arthas Be Redeemed?

So last week I was asked by WoW.com to do a guest post. They liked my application for their open Lore Columnist position, but had decided to go with Anne Stickney from Shades of Grey (my sincerest congratulations go to her. *bows* I'm happy to see more of the lore community gain prominence! ...especially someone who knows all about the "grey" *grins* ). They chose instead to give me the honor of being one of the first guest bloggers under their new Seed program, and I happily accepted.

So, on Sunday, I wrote up a post about whether or not Arthas deserved redemption. It was figured that the imminent release of his raid encounter would make the topic timely, and I wholly agreed. The article went live yesterday and can be found here.

Since WoW.com's traffic can be rather heavy and individual comments can get lost, I invite any regular LoreCrafted readers to post comments or discussions on the topic under this thread.

All in all, I thank everyone who reads my often scattered lore musings. You all make this journey worth it!

*bows*

Wednesday
Feb032010

Want to Know More Answers: The Scourge

Over the weekend I collected a handful of the questions spawned from Friday's Want to Know More prompt regarding the Scourge. I've answered a few, but have slated the rest for answers in a later post. Now, without further ado, let's get to some answers!

Sindragosa Menethil emailed, asking:

Why do Scourge necromancers get powers over Frost?

I've seen several possible explanations. Maybe because the Scourge is based out of Northrend, so they learned to control the elements that's abundant there. The theory I liked the best was that corrupted Fire-mages become Warlocks and corrupted Frost-mages become necromancers.

I guess it's mostly a pop culture thing, undead and the undead have been associated with cold for a long time, but what I really want to know is: Is there any intrinsic link between Frost and necromancy in teh Warcraft universe metaphysics?

The short answer is: no. Aside from the idea that death and cold go together like chocolate and peanut butter, there's no intrinsic link between undead in Warcraft and the element of frost. In fact, current lore strongly suggests that necromancy actually originated on Azeroth with the Nathrezim. Yeah, it was our good friends in the Burning Legion who gave us the magics of undeath, as this was seen in the War of the Ancients trilogy. We also have necromancers in Outland, beneath the shattered tomb of Auchindoun. These necromancers, too, have no intrinsic connection to the element of frost.

The necromancy we know and love today, however, gains its frost connection from the Lich King himself, who was encased in a block of magical ice that eventually came to be known as the Frozen Throne. Most of the Lich King's earliest time on Azeroth was spent trapped beneath Icecrown Glacier, and so most of his earliest minions were borne of the ice and were given control of these elements. This has, as we can clearly see, heavily influenced the Lich King's special breed of necromancy.

Jay asks in comments:

Its said that if there is no Lich King, the scourge will destory all life, what exactly is it that keeps them in check as it is. Free will exists in the undead, ie Sylvanas, whats stopping another breaking free and being the "big bad"

The Scourge today are kept in check by the sheer will of the Lich King himself. His immense psychic powers hold an iron grasp over the will of those undead near him. Those outside of this control become "mindless," and a few of these can be encountered in the Forsaken starter zone. In addition to this, some sentient beings are able to break free from his will. This happens commonly when the Lich King is weakened, and is the very reason why Sylvanas broke free. The death knights of the Ebon Blade, too, are free of his will.

It should be noted that "free" undead can still be mentally dominated by another entity strong enough. The Nathrezim have done this a few times, resulting in the skirmishes between Arthas's Scourge and Sylvanas's undead seen in The Frozen Throne and Arthas: Rise of the Lich King.

Jedster asks in comments:

1: Are Death Knights immortal? Whilst I am aware that The Forsaken are subject to an eventual end (Slow decay), I was under the impression that Death Knights, being more of the Scourge's elite soldiers as opposed to your average Forsaken, was created using a much more powerful type of necromantic magic, thus explaining why they have such strength and power.

2: Is there anything in the Lore that puts Death Knights as a class that is indeed the anti-Spell caster? or is this best to be put down as game mechanics?

Firstly, death knights are as immortal as any other Scourge undead, meaning they do not die of "old age" but can be killed by more forceful means. What's important to note about death knights, however, is that not all of them are undead. Some of them are still living, having voluntarily given their lives to the Lich King.

Certainly, if you choose to follow the story of the Ebon Blade death knights, you were killed and resurrected. But not all of the Scourge death knights follow this rule. Indeed, Arthas himself was still "alive" until he cut out his heart. This means that a death knight's "phsyical integrity" is not always tied to the power of the necromantic magic, but the power of what the Lich King gifts to him or her.

Secondly, the "anti-spellcaster" role is something purely given over to game mechanics. The earliest death knights were generally fallen paladins, and their abilities were twisted or tortured versions of paladin spells. As the hero class became reimagined for World of Warcraft, it was given a flavor and playstyle that was relatively unique.

 

Monday
Feb012010

Fall of the Lich King (Spoilers!)

Introduction (non-spoilery)

You know, I didn't expect it to be too long after the patch for someone to datamine the final cinematic to Wrath of the Lich King, but I really didn't expect it to happen before the patch dropped for most of us. Yes, the final moments of this expansion's plot arc have been leaked across the internet already, and I would be remiss if I mentioned nothing about it.

If you wish to see it, I have no doubt you can find it linked on various sites. However, due to the "end of the story" nature of this one, I've chosen to not place a link here. Worry not, it's not difficult to find. That said, I do wish to express a few thoughts about it , so I'm clearly marking everything below as spoiler material.

 

Fall of the Lich King (pretty dang spoilery)

The first thing I noticed about the cinematic is that we don't see anything about the actual battle that leads up to it. This ensures that there is still plenty of room for potential surprises during the encounter, which is nice, because the second thing I noticed about the cinematic was everything else that was missing.

Granted, there were a lot of plot threads that needed tying up, so any expecation of seeing a full round of conclusions in a four minute cinematic is a bit unrealistic. However, there are a few questions I'm still left with after viewing this. First and foremost: what about Mal'ganis? I'm aware of Blizzard's claim that he would have no role in 3.3, but a part of me was holding out in hopes that they were just attempting to teasingly deflect the question. It just seems to be ... glaringly incomplete if he does not appear. So I'm still retaining the hope that he'll have some part to play in the final encounter, but it's not a deep hope.

In fact, there is a distinct lack of actors in the cinematic. We see two expected characters, one predicted character, and one unsurprising character. But that's it, there are only four people in this. It was a foregone conclusion to see Arthas and Tirion there, and having the spirit of Terenas Menethil II, Arthas's father, preside over his son's death was fitting. And the prediction? Yeah, having Bolvar Fordragon don the Lich King's helm to control the Scourge was something that many in the lore community had assumed since Uther dropped that little bombshell. I'll admit to being a little disappointed in that, and not because it was done badly, but because ... it was rather predictable.

To quote from a previous article:

Conversely, I'm a little disappointed at what the Lich King revelations hint towards, as I feel that the potential story arc is a little ... rehashed. Perhaps we'll get a big surprise and the obvious assumed conclusion won't be what we actually see. But as it stands, it's leaning heavily towards the possibility that our immolated friend may have a story yet to come...

No surprises, unfortunately. The cinematic ends it as it was expected to end. As it stands, Bolvar Fordragon still burns with the fire of the red dragonflight, the flight of life. A man still infused with the fires of life donning the helm of undeath means that Fordragon could quite feasibly keep the Lich King entity occupied for an eternity. This makes him the only real choice for the sacrifice—for he can no longer live the normal life of a mortal.

The ending, too, seemed to jive with Blizzard's standard modus operandi regarding the fall of "big bads." We're meant to forget about them after they're gone, at least for a bit. And we're meant to not want to return to the lands affected by their defeat, at least until a suitable time has passed. Blizzard wants to push us into new content, not have us linger about old content, so as Fordragon orders Tirion:

"Now go! Leave this place and never return!"

...it feels like a command from Blizzard to its players as well. We are to leave Northrend and not worry about what happens to the frozen continent. We are to go and experience Catacylsm... at least until Blizzard chooses to revisit the Lich King once again. Having Bolvar seal the helm once again into the Frozen Throne (with it upon his head, no less) was a very fitting way to close that circle and leave things in a neutral state.

Despite my reservations, I enjoyed the cinematic immensely, and I must hand it to Blizzard's in-game cinematic team for pushing themselves further than before. This was an epic piece to watch, and no part of what was there did I dislike. Indeed, I've lost count of the number of times I've rewatched it.

Return of the Lich King?

So what about the future? Sure, we'll be dealing with Deathwing soon. And we may even pop into the Emerald Dream, or perhaps dive down to Nazjatar sometime after that. But what about the future of the Lich King?

As mentioned above, Fordragon may actually be capable of keeping the Lich King entity occupied "forevermore," but will Blizzard allow that? There's still a lot of unfinished business floating around our former orc, Ner'zhul, not the least of which is the Burning Legion's vengeance. We also question what happens to the Scourge. Will they retreat to Northrend and become a non-issue? What about those Scourge who retain their will?

All these questions become overwhelming until you realize a very simple fact: the Lich King is not dead, only Arthas is dead. So what's left in the helm? Is that Ner'zhul once more? Or is the entity irrevocably changed? Regardless, while Bolvar may succeed in keeping himself sealed away in the Frozen Throne, can he succeed in fending off the greater enemies that may seek him out in the future?

Only time will tell.